Film review – Scream 4 (2011)

14 April 2011
Scream 4: Sidney Prescott (Neve Campbell)

Sidney Prescott (Neve Campbell)

When director Wes Craven and screenwriter Kevin Williamson teamed up to make the original Scream film in 1996 they delivered something that audiences at the time hadn’t really seen too much of before. Self-referential films were nothing new but with Scream Craven and Williamson cleverly combined an awareness of slasher film conventions (including the often dubious clichés associated with the genre) with a genuine affection for scary films. The result was a classic post-modern film that worked successfully as both a tribute and a parody of 1970s and 1980s teen-slasher films. It was frightening like a horror film should be while also being a lot of fun.

The strength of the resulting series (in particular the second film) was then about how well each film responded to trends in horror cinema and the characteristics of individual films within a franchise. The self-referential nature of the series was explored through the concept of the Stab films – the horror franchise watched by the characters within the actual Scream horror franchise. In Scream 4 the extent of intertexuality within the horror genre is so pronounced that even the Stab films have become blatantly self-referential so that the films within the films are now commenting on themselves as constructs. Scream 4 doesn’t knowingly wink at the audience, it holds up a neon sign declaring itself to be very clever. And yet, it mostly works.

Scream 4: Sheriff Dwight "Dewey" Riley (David Arquette) and Gale Weathers-Riley (Courteney Cox)

Sheriff Dwight "Dewey" Riley (David Arquette) and Gale Weathers-Riley (Courteney Cox)

Part four is most effective when exploring the idea that as a film set and made a decade later, about a Ghostface copycat killer on the loose, is effectively a remake or reboot in an era when so many Hollywood horror films are remakes and reboots. While original cast members Neve Campbell, David Arquette and Courteney Cox are all back to reprise their roles, most of the rest of the main cast are emerging actors. The generational gap is expressed through commentary on the way that today’s teenagers and twentysomethings have grown up with remakes and self-aware horror films (of course ironically resulting from Scream) that are very different to the ‘old school’ films that the original characters grew up on.

Scream 4 is less nuanced in the way it reflects other trends in horror. We’re told that a reboot film this far in the franchise should contain more gruesome and elaborate torture-porn style killings but apart from a single gory shot of one of the victims, we never get a sense of that. Despite the surveillance/found footage trend of presenting deaths as supposedly being caught on amateur camera – either by accident or filmed Peeping Tom style by the voyeuristic killer – this theme only gets paid lip service. The scene where one character laboriously explains how the murders were filmed and why feels part undergraduate academic deconstruction essay and part ‘now that you are about to die let me tell you all my plans’ plot device.

Scream 4While the enjoyably smart-ass self-aware nature of the Scream films isn’t consistently successful in this new instalment, it does what the original films did so well and that is to take the audience on a fun ride with a decent blend of scares and laughs. The whole cast are very likeable and Craven and Williamson know how to maintain the right tone so that the film remains bloody and violent enough without ever getting nasty. The scares are more wickedly fun vicarious thrills than truly terrifying and the comedy doesn’t always work but that’s the nature of the Scream films. Highly enjoyable with no great revelations, surprises or significant inventiveness, Scream 4 is still a fun and welcome visit from an old friend.

Thomas Caldwell, 2011

Bookmark and Share


Film review – My Bloody Valentine (2009)

11 February 2009

_MG_3104_04347RTo use the current Hollywood vernacular, My Bloody Valentine is a “re-imagining” of the 1981Canadian slasher film of the same name. This new film is the sort of re-make, sequel and revamp where the basic concept and characters have been retained but it is essentially a whole new film. As in the original version, a small mining town is being menaced by a crazed miner who wears an identity concealing gas mask and dispatches his victims, predominantly, with a mean looking pickaxe. After massacring a bunch of teenagers he is then supposedly killed. However ten years later the murders start again and it seems that the survivors of the previous massacre are the primary targets. But is it the same miner who is again doing the killing or has somebody else inherited the gas mask, boiler suit and pickaxe? The big mystery that the film wants the audience to ponder is who the killer may be. However, the real mystery to My Bloody Valentine is whether it is supposed to be hilarious self-parody or if it is a classic example of a film that is so bad it’s good.

Read the rest of this entry »