Glamour over grit at the AACTA Awards Ceremony

7 February 2012

I’ve recently become one of the regular film and television columnist for the Kill Your Darlings blog Killings. For my first piece I wrote about last week’s 2011 Samsung Australian Academy of Cinema and Television Arts (AACTA) award ceremony and Channel 9 broadcast:

The AACTA awards are an attempt to rise above the negativity and celebrate our local achievements. However, by focusing so much on mainstream appeal, celebrity and glamour, the ceremony and the broadcast may have lost its original audience – the people who are actually passionate about Australian film and television.

The full column is available at Killings


Why I Adore Dogs in Space

18 November 2011
Dogs in Space: Anna (Saskia Post) and Sam (Michael Hutchence)

Anna (Saskia Post) and Sam (Michael Hutchence)

I first saw Dogs in Space (written and directed by Richard Lowenstein) when I was in my twenties, some time in the late 1990s, about a decade after the film was released in 1986. It was a revelation. I’d never seen a film that felt so distinctively Melbourne in a way that I could recognise. Also, up until that point, I’d never seen an Australian film that felt so influenced by New Wave European cinema in its almost anarchic abandonment of traditional narrative structure. I had seen plenty of ‘worthy’ Australian art-house films (which I also love and cherish) but not something this playful and rebellious. It was instant love. I remember on at least two occasions introducing friends to Dogs in Space, and their response was always one of anger: ‘Why the hell haven’t you shown this to me before?’ they demanded.

And yet, Dogs in Space  is about Melbourne in 1979, when I’d only been alive for a few years. I’m not at all qualified to comment on the authenticity of what takes place in the film. It feels slightly exaggerated, but the testimonies in the 2009 documentary We’re Livin’ on Dog Food suggest that it’s not. What I did identify with was a spirit; the legacy of which I was experiencing at the time, living in share houses in Melbourne’s inner suburbs. Like the Dogs in Space characters, I was a middle-class kid from the suburbs who was somewhat ‘slumming’ it – too old to live at home and too young to commit to anything that felt like a real job. And that’s what the film captures – the desire of youths to deconstruct themselves from mainstream society and rebuild themselves into something ‘real’, regardless of their background. Dogs in Space makes a point of reminding the audience that punk in Australia was a cultural movement embraced predominantly by the middle-class, but that didn’t make it any less charged or meaningful.

The film begins by defining how it situates itself within Australian culture. After brief 1957 archival footage of early Soviet space launches, which includes sending Laika the dog into orbit, Dogs in Space opens with a menacing shot of a beat-up car idling in the night. One of its very rough-looking occupants sticks his head out of the window and, in the most nasally Australian twang, snarls to an unseen passer-by, ‘Hey! Dog-face! Show us your snatch!’ The scene looks like it belongs to any number of Ozploitation films of the era, combining a Mad Max aesthetic with distinctly bogan pub rock culture.

Dogs in Space: Anna (Saskia Post) and Sam (Michael Hutchence)

It’s a very specific image of Australian identity and one that is introduced at the start of Dogs in Space so it can be quickly shot down in flames. There are other faces to Australian culture and until then, and mostly since, those faces are not given much attention. These alternate faces are of course the punks of late 1970s Melbourne who are introduced in the film, camping outside a David Bowie concert. The car-load of obnoxious bogans screeches up to torment them, but are quickly dispensed with and sent on their way. This film is not for them, or those who identify with them. Instead it’s for a subculture that briefly thrived in inner-city student share houses and venues around Australia, whose legacy introduced and developed some of Australia’s most celebrated music.

The film’s title sequence then concludes with a slow approach shot of the film’s main setting: a run down house in Richmond filled with various occupants who are either living there legitimately, squatting, or simply hanging out. Over the top of the soundtrack different pieces of media float by: the opening titles of Countdown, a station identification for iconic Melbourne radio station Triple R and Molly Meldrum talking about the Bowie gig. The various characters who filter through the house are an assortment of musicians, political activists and folks just wanting to have a good time. They have sex, listen to music, take drugs and throw parties. One of them is even trying to study for his engineering exams.

The almost complete absence of a narrative allows the film to simply indulge in scene after scene of chaotic activity. Some characters we get to know, some are just fleeting fragments. Orchestrated long shots convey the energy and excitement of gigs and parties. Strands of music performances and conversations flow in and out of the film to make it a series of impressionist fragments that, once combined, make some sort of brilliant sense.

Dogs in Space soundtrackThe soundtrack, produced by Ollie Olsen, is one of my favourite film soundtracks from Australia or anywhere else in the world for that matter. It includes songs by Iggy Pop, Gang of Four and Brian Eno plus an assortment of songs from Melbourne’s ‘little band scene’. Many of the songs are played in the film by the original performers, including Marie Hoy (who delivers one of the greatest covers of Rowland S. Howard’s ‘Shivers’), Primitive Calculators and Thrush and the Cunts. Then there are the songs sung by Michael Hutchence, lead singer of pop group INXS and the film’s star. Hutchence’s character in the film is based on Sam Sejavka from The Ears, so appropriately Hutchence performs a couple of Ears covers, including the titular ‘Dogs In Space’. However, the stand-out for me is ‘Rooms For The Memory’ as it’s a brilliant fusion of post-punk and pop, linking the period the film is set in to the period the film was made in, and making it a catchy and eventually devastating song to finish the film with.

And what about Hutchence, in what would sadly be one of his few acting roles? As the hedonistic, wild, self indulgent, magnetic and handsome Sam, he’s a bizarre Aussie Jim Morrison: reptilian, lecherous, pretentious and extraordinary. He is instantly recognisable as a creative genius who, through self-indulgence, is screwing up his life and the lives of those around him. You start off thinking Sam’s a bit of a prat and then get seduced by his carefree confidence and charismatic recklessness. This is all turned on its head in one of my favourite scenes when his mother shows up to do his laundry and bring him a hot dinner. Not only is his persona demythologised, but you also see the true extent of his selfishness and lazy sense of entitlement. And yet he is so confident, so carefree and so likeable, making him a wonderfully chaotic antihero to structure a chaotic anti-film around.

Dogs in Space: Luchio (Tony Helou) and Tim (Nique Needles)

Luchio (Tony Helou) and Tim (Nique Needles)

Then there is Saskia Post as Anna, Sam’s beautiful and tragic girlfriend who knows he is leeching off her, but can’t help being drawn back to him. Post provides the heart of the film, looking after the more vulnerable drifters who come through the house and being patient and tolerant of Sam, way beyond the call of duty. She radiates every time she is on screen with her combination of punk attitude and classical Hollywood beauty. The rest of the supporting cast are too extensive to mention and I latch onto somebody new on every viewing. However, I have a particular soft spot for Tim (Nique Needles) who looks so sad while pretending he was going to quit the band that have just kicked him out. I also love Chris Haywood’s cameo as the uncle with the chainsaw, and poor old Luchio (Tony Helou) who is trying to study for his exams amid the parties, band rehearsals, noisy sex and general mayhem – I once had a Luchio year.

Dogs in Space is one of the very few Australian films that reflects an Australian identity that I can relate to, even though it depicts a period and scene that I never knew. It’s affectionate and critical of Australia’s middle class punks; celebrating the scene while also providing a mournful coda for how it would all come to an end. Energetic, youthful, frequently hilarious and ultimately so sad, Dogs in Space is an Australian counter-culture classic to which I continually return, and introduce to new like-minded friends – who are inevitably annoyed that I haven’t shown it to them sooner.

Originally published here on the AFI blog.

Thomas Caldwell, 2011

Bookmark and Share


DVD review – Mrs Carey’s Concert (2011), Region 4, Madman

27 September 2011

Mrs Carey’s ConcertTwo popular genres come together in this Australian documentary – the backstage musical and the inspirational-teacher-saves-troubled-students drama. Karen Carey is the music director at the Sydney girls school MLC, which holds a concert involving 1200 girls from the school at the Sydney Opera House every two years. The next concert is approaching and Mrs Carey’s Concert documents the challenges that lie ahead, especially in terms of involving reluctant, difficult and under confident students.

The fly-on-the-wall approach taken by directors Bob Connolly and Sophie Raymond recalls the approach taken by Nicolas Philibert in his 2006 film To Be and to Have about a primary school class in rural France. Similarly, Mrs Carey’s Concert conveys an enormous amount of information about its subjects simply through observation and strategic editing. During the climax of the film, which of course is the concert, cutaway shots to the faces of key players in the film communicate everything that the audience needs to know about what the various moments mean to them. This graceful and unobtrusive editing creates a work that feels authentic and non-judgemental.

The two dominant stories that emerge are those of ‘problem’ students, Iris Shi and Emily Sun. In Iris’s case she is extraordinarily extroverted and precociously disruptive, to the point of being infuriating. Over the course of the film we see the teachers gently but firmly appeal to her better nature and their patience is remarkable, as is how well they conceal just how much in charge of the situation they are. By the time Iris is telling the camera how well she reads people in order to manipulate them, her bravado feels overcompensated to the point that she becomes a strangely sympathetic figure. There is something ultimately sad about her.

Mrs Carey's ConcertEmily is a different challenge for the staff. While her troubled past is mostly behind her, and only mentioned in the film rather than shown, she severely lacks the passion and confidence to reach her true potential as a gifted musician. Her journey is the most rewarding in the film as the focus is not on her musical talent – that is taken as a given – but on her ability to find the inner strength and emotional investment to be truly great. The full extent of her back-story is strategically revealed late in the film to put her tentativeness into context and watching her transformation is extremely rewarding. One scene involves her having to tell the orchestra what a particular piece of music means to her. For a brief moment she lets down her guard to describe how she feels, before catching herself out and retreating back inside herself again. Such moments are what define Mrs Carey’s Concert as being more than simply a documentary about privileged schoolgirls putting on a concert.

Like the payoff at the end of the fiction film The Concert, Mrs Carey’s Concert delivers an emotionally charged and satisfying experience. The sound mix allows the music to really surround the viewer and interestingly any voiceovers removed from what is on screen at the time come from the back speakers so that the immediate story remains in the foreground. It is also worth watching the end credits through to the very end as the final music wonderfully sums up what the film has been about and is also rather sweet.

Thomas Caldwell, 2011

Bookmark and Share


Film review – Face to Face (2011)

8 September 2011
Face to Face: Wayne Travers (Luke Ford)

Wayne Travers (Luke Ford)

Wayne Travers (Luke Ford) is potentially facing jail after repeatedly ramming his former boss’s car in a rage after being fired. Wayne is angry, resentful and sullen while his boss Greg Baldoni (Vince Colosimo), who was in the car at the time, is understandably upset. Instead of going through the court system Wayne is allowed to take part in a community conference where he confronts Greg, other former work colleagues and a handful of other people connected to the incident. What seems like a straightforward situation with Wayne clearly in the wrong and not showing much remorse soon becomes far more complicated through the conference process.

The release of Face to Face could not have been better timed considering some of the current debate in the Australian media over criminal sentencing. According to some commentators offenders are getting off too lightly and that’s due to the courts and judges being out of touch with community values. This attitude was proven to be a myth by the report Public judgment on sentencing: final results from the Tasmanian Jury Sentencing Study, released in February this year. In the report it cites a study of 698 jurors; 90 per cent of who felt that the sentences handed down on cases they had served on were ‘very’ or ‘fairly’ appropriate. 52 per cent would have handed down lighter sentences. While this report significantly vindicates the courts it also reveals that once people know all the details behind a crime, they are less likely to respond with a knee jerk call for tougher sentencing. Once mitigating factors and background information comes to light, issuing blame and culpability can become so much more complex. This is what Face to Face is about.

Over the course of the film we discover that behind Wayne’s anger are varied factors that don’t excuse his behaviour but help to explain why he responded the way he did. Wayne is not let of the hook, but at the same time it becomes apparent that being the victim of workplace bullying over a sustained time has taken a toll that many of the people in the conference room with him shoulder a lot of responsibility for. Face to Face almost functions as a mystery film where over the course of the conference various secrets and events are revealed to dispel many of the assumptions the audience are encouraged to feel about Wayne in the beginning.

Face to Face: Jack (Matthew Newton)

Jack (Matthew Newton)

While flashbacks are successfully integrated to flesh out the back-story, Face to Face is essentially a single location film set in the conference room with all the actors together for nearly the entire film. Working in Australia again for the first time in almost 10 years, director Michael Rymer makes sure the camera is continually being repositioned around the actors to keep each shot fresh and to best channel the enormous energy that transpires from having so many strong characters and actors all in a confined space together.

While 12 Angry Men is a fitting comparison film, Face to Face also evokes the excellent 2008 Australian film Men’s Group, which had a smaller cast and more external scenes, but was still significantly comprised of group discussion scenes between the main characters. However, while Men’s Group incorporated very large amounts of improvised dialogue, Face to Face feels heavily scripted and indeed the end credits reveal that it has indeed been adapted from a stage play by David Williamson. Many of the characters certainly feel like typical Williamson characters as they take on almost archetypal characteristics to convey specific values and attitudes within Australian society. This mostly works and it allows the film to cover an extraordinary range of contemporary issues. Not only is Face to Face about workplace bullying and how we perceive a criminal act, but it also covers pack male behaviour, racism, worker exploitation, infidelity, class conflict and domestic violence. Sometimes it does come dangerously close to feeling like a checklist of important issues, but it is ultimately successful in pulling together all the threads to provide an insightful study into human behaviour, how situations spiral out of control and the shifting nature of guilt, culpability and victimisation.

Face to Face: Claire and Greg Baldoni (Sigrid Thornton and Vince Colosimo)

Claire and Greg Baldoni (Sigrid Thornton and Vince Colosimo)

Where the film is less success is the overtly theatrical dialogue that just doesn’t feel quite right on film. Especially at the start, some of the lines are over explanatory and too reliant on language to define the characters. It is blatantly a script that has come from the stage and onto the screen, seemingly with very little alteration to compensate for this transition to the more visual medium of cinema. Nevertheless, the resulting almost unintentionally stylised dialogue does settle down as the film progresses and nearly all the actors overcome these issues. Small moments of humour are also successfully weaved into the film to strategically lighten the mood when required.

Initial distracting staginess aside, Face to Face is compelling cinema that showcases a marvellous group of performers. Ford and Colosimo are the standouts, but the whole ensemble, which includes Sigrid Thornton and Matthew Newton, are also great. The emotional roller coaster that the characters go through, where they confront their misdeeds to understand how they all played a part in what happened, is genuine and authentic. Face to Face deals with a disturbingly recognisable aspect of mainstream Australian culture in its depiction of a pack tormenting a weaker element, or being complicit in the torment by doing nothing, and how this behaviour is all too often laughed off as ‘taking the piss’. Perhaps more importantly, it is convincingly optimistic that once presented with all the facts, people are capable of making compassionate and rational decisions. In a time of so much misinformation, hype and sensationalism, Face to Face offers some welcomed hope.

Thomas Caldwell, 2011

Bookmark and Share


An interview with Jim Loach, the director of Oranges and Sunshine

12 June 2011
Oranges and Sunshine director Jim Loach

Oranges and Sunshine director Jim Loach

Over 130,000 children were deported from the UK as part of various Child Migration Schemes. It is estimated that Australia received 7,000 children between 1912 and 1970. Many of these children were sent without the consent or knowledge of their parents. Once in Australia the children were used for cheap labour and many were abused.

In 1986 an English social worker named Margaret Humphreys discovered and then exposed the scheme despite immense pressure from very powerful groups who had a vested interest in it being kept quite. The new Australian/UK co-production Oranges and Sunshine, by director Jim Loach, tells Margaret’s story (who is still working to reunited lost family members).

This interview was recorded on Friday 27 May 2011 and then played on Film Buff’s Forecast (Triple R, 3RRR 102.7FM) on Saturday 11 June 2011.

Download link (running time = 13:47)

Bookmark and Share


Film review – Oranges and Sunshine (2010)

7 June 2011
Oranges and Sunshine: Margaret Humphreys (Emily Watson)

Margaret Humphreys (Emily Watson)

It must be challenging to make a film that spreads awareness about an important issue while still adhering to the traditional cinematic narrative conventions that are necessary to maintain dramatic interest. In Oranges and Sunshine, a UK/Australia co-production, director Jim Loach and writer Rona Munro get the balance right. The issue they depict is the shameful deportation of an estimated 7000 children from the UK to Australia from 1912 to 1970. The children were often sent without the consent or knowledge of their parents. As one of the former child migrant characters says, they were promised oranges and sunshine, but once in Australia they were used for cheap labour and many were abused.

Instead of being set during the 1940s or 1950s, when the majority of the child migration occurred, Oranges and Sunshine is set during the late 1980s and follows the work done by English social worker Margaret Humphreys, played by Emily Watson in the film. Margaret’s investigation into the scheme, while she worked at reuniting lost family members, provides a perfect narrative structure for the audience to learn about what happened at the same time that she does. We share not only her furious disbelief at the exploitation and injustice, but also her drive to find out more.

Oranges and Sunshine: Jack (Hugo Weaving) and Margaret Humphreys (Emily Watson)

Jack (Hugo Weaving) and Margaret (Emily Watson)

Loach’s restrained direction and excellent casting allows the film to express how the scheme affected people’s lives without it ever becoming melodramatic or sentimental. The film is understated without ever being obtuse so that the audience gets an impression of the harm done to many of the children without it being unnecessarily laboured. The main two former child migrant characters whom Margaret works with are both men of a similar age; Jack played by Hugo Weaving and Len played by David Wenham. While loosely based on real people Jack and Len are composite characters used to represent two of the broadly different types of responses Margaret encountered. Both have damaged souls, but while Jack is quiet and fragile, Len is aggressively defensive. As the three leads Watson, Weaving and Wenham are uniformly excellent, but in one of Weaving’s key scenes he delivers what is possibly his finest performance to date.

Towards the end of Oranges and Sunshine Margaret warns Len not to expect some kind of cathartic moment that will neatly resolve or vindicate his experiences. This echoes the sentiments of the real life Margaret Humphreys who regards her work in finding missing family members and campaigning for an enquiry as simply part of her on-going day job. To the credit of the film, it doesn’t undermine Margaret’s sentiments by concluding with a traditional moment of narrative closure, and yet it does provide a climatic final scene that validates Margaret’s work up until that point. It’s a deft touch to provide a scene that is so dramatically satisfying without betraying the overall idea that the story is not done yet.

Oranges and Sunshine: Margaret Humphreys (Emily Watson) and Len (David Wenham)

Margaret (Emily Watson) and Len (David Wenham)

With Oranges and Sunshine Jim Loach has announced himself a distinctive cinematic voice who is able to handle complex and difficult subject matter with sensitivity and skill. His film functions as both entertainment and as a piece of social awareness that goes beyond the confines of the cinema. Perhaps most impressive is that in an era where popular culture is rediscovering and reinterpreting so many superhero narratives, Oranges and Sunshine highlights the work of a real life hero. Margaret Humphreys may not have superpowers but amid all the cynicism and feelings of powerlessness in the world, her courage and determination against a great injustice is truly inspiring.

Thomas Caldwell, 2011

Bookmark and Share


Film review – Snowtown (2011)

19 May 2011
Snowtown: Jamie Vlassakis (Lucas Pittaway) and John Bunting (Daniel Henshall)

Jamie Vlassakis (Lucas Pittaway) and John Bunting (Daniel Henshall)

A film about the Snowtown ‘Bodies in the Barrels’ murders could have gone a number ways. The organised series of killings in the Adelaide suburbs during the 1990s could have easily resulted in a serial killer thriller narrative or even an ultra violent spin on the gangster genre where the crime family are motivated by bloodlust rather than money. Instead, Snowtown is an extreme exercise in Australian miserablism designed to demonstrate how toxic ideas spread like a plague in vulnerable communities to manifest in the most horrific way possible.

The minimalist throbbing soundtrack, the stripped down improvised dialogue by the film’s predominantly non-professional cast and the relentless depiction of the suburban bleakness and despair makes Snowtown extremely grim viewing. However, this is not a film offering vicarious thrills from a safe distance but a film designed to get under your skin. It seems designed to reveal how somebody like John Bunting (played by Daniel Henshall, the film’s only trained actor) can infiltrate a depressed and frustrated community to spread fear, hatred and bigotry. Unlike the similarly themed The Boys, which was a very tightly structured character study building to a shocking conclusion, Snowtown is a slow burning and slightly more sprawling film where the violence seeps in to the story with a disturbing casualness.

Snowtown

The film focuses on Jamie Vlassakis (Lucas Pittaway), a fatherless teenage boy who’s the victim of the type of abuse that John claims is epidemic. Similarly to J in Animal Kingdom, Jamie is an almost blank slate. He doesn’t speak much, is socially awkward and highly impressionable. As his worldview becomes shaped by John’s seductive self-righteousness and he witnesses how much other members of the community approve of John’s agenda, he eventually follows John in his deranged crusade.

Most of the rest of the characters in Snow Town exist on the periphery and one frustration with the film is how difficult it is to sometimes keep track of who is who, let alone identify with many of them. However, withholding so much character information seems like a deliberate alienation strategy. It dehumanises many of the other characters to reflect the way the murders become part of Jamie’s daily life. Eventually, when a character is bumped off they are just another body and not worth dwelling on.

For a film containing very little actual onscreen violence, violence and brutality run through the veins of Snowtown as an expression of the very worst attitudes in society. Snowtown shows what happens when the irrational outrage, paranoia and prejudice of a community is harnessed by a charismatic figure. Once somebody like John convincingly validates those destructive feelings and promises to deliver the solution, those feelings can increasingly wield influence, stripping away compassion and rationality to the point where murder eventually becomes an acceptable outcome. John even likens the drive behind his vigilantism against ‘perverts’ to the Anzac spirit in a scene where the film disturbingly demonstrates how a popular leader can twist history and mythology to justify anything. Snowtown is a startling and sickening insight into Australia’s heart of darkness.

Thomas Caldwell, 2011

Bookmark and Share


The federal budget and the Australian film industry

17 May 2011

My piece on how the new federal budget may affect the Australian film industry appeared in the arts opinion column Canvas in The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald newspapers yesterday on Monday 16 May 2011.

The increase in funding and tax rebate reforms announced in the federal budget last week seem to be very much about encouraging an ongoing diversity of films produced within Australia while maintaining a healthy and long-term sustainable film industry.

However, the focus on digital and visual effects hints that maybe there is still a push for more genre films to be made.

The full article “We risk becoming a post-production facility for overseas films” is available online on The Age website.


Film review – Mad Bastards (2010)

9 May 2011
Mad Bastards: TJ (Dean Daley-Jones)

TJ (Dean Daley-Jones)

TJ (Dean Daley-Jones) is a mad bastard. Full of attitude and prone to aggressive outbursts, TJ travels over 2000 kilometres to see Bullet (Lucas Yeeda), his 13-year-old son whom he’s never met. Unfortunately, the environment of domestic violence and alcoholism that Bullet is living in means that he’s quickly becoming a mad bastard too. Like many men who suffer from an inability to communicate and grow-up, TJ is the source and recipient of so many frustrations and so much harm. However, Mad Bastards is not a film about despair but a film about overcoming masculine pride and reconnecting with what matters in life.

Writer/director Brendan Fletcher has a long personal history with the Kimberly region of north-western Australia where most of the film is set, and uses the stories and experiences he cultivated to carve out Mad Bastards. Almost the entire cast are non-professional Indigenous Australian actors and as revealed in a series of interviews before the final credits, in many cases they play characters derived from personal experiences. The resulting performances are confident but contain an unpolished rawness that contributes to the film’s authenticity. Fletcher also has a documentary background (including collaborating with Leah Purcell on Black Chicks Talking) so is clearly comfortable with the improvisational approach he has taken with the actors.

Mad Bastards: Bullet (Lucas Yeeda)

Bullet (Lucas Yeeda)

There is an aching sadness running throughout Mad Bastards that often catches you unawares, especially when the camera lingers on the extraordinary landscape that surrounds these troubled men. The contrast between the natural beauty of the Australian wilderness (beautifully shot by cinematographer Allan Collins) and the social problems that plague the people within it is heartbreaking. It also means that moments where the characters reconnect with each other are extremely poignant. Water is an evocative motif for healing and there are several scenes where the characters reach out to each other, wash away their demons or reflect on their lives while situated near or in bodies of water.

The final driving force behind Mad Bastards is the music score by Alex Lloyd and the legendary Pigram Brothers, who are also producers and appear in the film as themselves as a sort of Greek Chorus. There is a gentle melancholy underneath their simple melodies but also a sense of hope for a brighter future. Combined with the film craftsmanship so evidently on display and the honest performances, Mad Bastards is simply Australia’s most impressive film since Animal Kingdom.

Originally appeared in The Big Issue, No. 379, 2011

Thomas Caldwell, 2011

Bookmark and Share


An interview with Brendan Fletcher, the writer/director of Mad Bastards

30 April 2011
Mad Bastards writer/director Brendan Fletcher

Mad Bastards writer/director Brendan Fletcher

Brendan Fletcher is the writer and director of Mad Bastards, a new Australian feature film that premiered at the Sundance Film Festival and is set for a general release in Australian on 5 May 2011. Almost set entirely in the Kimberley region of Western Australia and predominantly starring non-professional actors, Mad Bastards is an insightful and moving look at some of the problems facing Indigenous men today.

This interview was recorded on Thursday 7 April 2011 and then played on Film Buff’s Forecast (Triple R, 3RRR 102.7FM) on Saturday 23 April 2011.

Part 1:

Download link (running time = 15:14)

Part 2:

Download link (running time = 12:16)

Bookmark and Share


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,241 other followers