<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MIFF 2009 reviews &#8211; 35 Shots of Rum (2008), The White Ribbon (2009), Shadow Play (2009)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/08/06/part-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/08/06/part-5/</link>
	<description>Film reviews, criticism and discussion by Thomas Caldwell</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:17:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Martin</title>
		<link>http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/08/06/part-5/#comment-731</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Martin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 07:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/?p=2523#comment-731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;The White Ribbon&lt;/i&gt; is all about the journey, not the destination.  It&#039;s a whodunnit where whodunnit isn&#039;t important.  The culture of the time is what&#039;s on show, how people relate and react to the violence around them.  I found it thoroughly engrossing and having just returned from my last film at MIFF, I can confidently say it was my festival favourite.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The White Ribbon</i> is all about the journey, not the destination.  It&#8217;s a whodunnit where whodunnit isn&#8217;t important.  The culture of the time is what&#8217;s on show, how people relate and react to the violence around them.  I found it thoroughly engrossing and having just returned from my last film at MIFF, I can confidently say it was my festival favourite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/08/06/part-5/#comment-727</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Caldwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 04:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/?p=2523#comment-727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Claire. I don&#039;t think you are shallow at all. In fact, I suspect that your response is exactly what Haneke intended. He often likes to undermine audience expectations in order to comment on how we have become accustomed to certain cinematic norms such as the cause and effect relationship, and closed resolutions. &lt;em&gt; Caché&lt;/em&gt; concluded in a similar way to &lt;em&gt;The White Ribbon&lt;/em&gt; and both the &lt;em&gt;Funny Games&lt;/em&gt; films are exercises in frustrating the audience. 

I think Haneke is a great filmmaker but his films can become very academic and demand a level of intellectual engagement that you really have to be in the right mood for. &lt;em&gt;The White Ribbon&lt;/em&gt; is tricky because for the most part it is so engaging and fascinating but you are then expected to get all analytical and detached right at the end!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Claire. I don&#8217;t think you are shallow at all. In fact, I suspect that your response is exactly what Haneke intended. He often likes to undermine audience expectations in order to comment on how we have become accustomed to certain cinematic norms such as the cause and effect relationship, and closed resolutions. <em> Caché</em> concluded in a similar way to <em>The White Ribbon</em> and both the <em>Funny Games</em> films are exercises in frustrating the audience. </p>
<p>I think Haneke is a great filmmaker but his films can become very academic and demand a level of intellectual engagement that you really have to be in the right mood for. <em>The White Ribbon</em> is tricky because for the most part it is so engaging and fascinating but you are then expected to get all analytical and detached right at the end!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: claire</title>
		<link>http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/08/06/part-5/#comment-722</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[claire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/?p=2523#comment-722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saw &lt;em&gt;The White Ribbon&lt;/em&gt; on Tuesday night and was completely engrossed in it until the non-ending. Call me shallow but I wanted some catharsis (or at least an ending that wasn&#039;t so freaking abrupt), dammit!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw <em>The White Ribbon</em> on Tuesday night and was completely engrossed in it until the non-ending. Call me shallow but I wanted some catharsis (or at least an ending that wasn&#8217;t so freaking abrupt), dammit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

