<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MIFF 2009 reviews &#8211; Thirst (2009), Like You Know It All (2009), The Girlfriend Experience (2009)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/07/26/miff-2009-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/07/26/miff-2009-part-2/</link>
	<description>Film reviews, criticism and discussion by Thomas Caldwell</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 05:45:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/07/26/miff-2009-part-2/#comment-1381</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Caldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/?p=2480#comment-1381</guid>
		<description>Hi David

Yes, &lt;em&gt;Thirst&lt;/em&gt; is not as good as &lt;em&gt;Old Boy&lt;/em&gt; and I think &lt;em&gt;Old Boy&lt;/em&gt; is Park&#039;s best film to date. I agree that &lt;em&gt;Thirst&lt;/em&gt; could have done with a trim somewhere in the middle as it does slump slightly but overall it is a film that for me overcomes any of its shortcomings. 

Cheers
Thomas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David</p>
<p>Yes, <em>Thirst</em> is not as good as <em>Old Boy</em> and I think <em>Old Boy</em> is Park&#8217;s best film to date. I agree that <em>Thirst</em> could have done with a trim somewhere in the middle as it does slump slightly but overall it is a film that for me overcomes any of its shortcomings. </p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Thomas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David O'Connell</title>
		<link>http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/07/26/miff-2009-part-2/#comment-1378</link>
		<dc:creator>David O'Connell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 05:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/?p=2480#comment-1378</guid>
		<description>Hey Thomas, finally got around to watching &lt;em&gt;Thirst&lt;/em&gt; last night! A bit streaky but as usual with Park the best bits are VERY good and it&#039;s a visual treat from start to finish. Though it doesn&#039;t have the same flair as &lt;em&gt;Oldboy&lt;/em&gt; or some of his other films.
 
It definitely could have been trimmed by about 15-20 minutes though - I think his failing is a lack of coherence in the writing at times.
But totally agreed about how erotic the sex scenes are, and I was surprised at how funny it was too. It has some hilarious moments like the paralysed mother pointing the finger of blame during the mahjong game. Dark but brilliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Thomas, finally got around to watching <em>Thirst</em> last night! A bit streaky but as usual with Park the best bits are VERY good and it&#8217;s a visual treat from start to finish. Though it doesn&#8217;t have the same flair as <em>Oldboy</em> or some of his other films.</p>
<p>It definitely could have been trimmed by about 15-20 minutes though &#8211; I think his failing is a lack of coherence in the writing at times.<br />
But totally agreed about how erotic the sex scenes are, and I was surprised at how funny it was too. It has some hilarious moments like the paralysed mother pointing the finger of blame during the mahjong game. Dark but brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
