<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Film review &#8211; My Year Without Sex (2009)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/05/16/film-review-my-year-without-sex-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/05/16/film-review-my-year-without-sex-2009/</link>
	<description>Film reviews, criticism and discussion by Thomas Caldwell</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:17:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/05/16/film-review-my-year-without-sex-2009/#comment-702</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Caldwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/?p=1953#comment-702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I reckon you&#039;re spot on with the micro/macro thing Lynden. It&#039;s a film that doesn&#039;t hang together as a whole but is instead a series of beautifully nuanced moments.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I reckon you&#8217;re spot on with the micro/macro thing Lynden. It&#8217;s a film that doesn&#8217;t hang together as a whole but is instead a series of beautifully nuanced moments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lynden barber</title>
		<link>http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/05/16/film-review-my-year-without-sex-2009/#comment-701</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lynden barber]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/?p=1953#comment-701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you&#039;re right about the episodic nature. My feeling is that on a scene-by-scene, micro level, the film is beautifully written and observed. 

But on an overall, macro level, the script is not very well structured in dramatic and narrative terms. 

Emotionally it&#039;s too much on the same level, whatever Watt&#039;s intention. There&#039;s an overall flatness to the experience, no sense of build, of moments of intensity relieved by other moments of repose. 

Eg. we&#039;re meant to believe that at one point Horler&#039;s character sinks into depression - but without the chapter titles telling us this I would have had little idea. She seems to get a bit downbeat and then she recovers. No real pain, too much on the surface.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re right about the episodic nature. My feeling is that on a scene-by-scene, micro level, the film is beautifully written and observed. </p>
<p>But on an overall, macro level, the script is not very well structured in dramatic and narrative terms. </p>
<p>Emotionally it&#8217;s too much on the same level, whatever Watt&#8217;s intention. There&#8217;s an overall flatness to the experience, no sense of build, of moments of intensity relieved by other moments of repose. </p>
<p>Eg. we&#8217;re meant to believe that at one point Horler&#8217;s character sinks into depression &#8211; but without the chapter titles telling us this I would have had little idea. She seems to get a bit downbeat and then she recovers. No real pain, too much on the surface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

