<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cinema Autopsy’s predictions for the 81st Academy Awards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/02/19/cinema-autopsy%e2%80%99s-predictions-for-the-81st-academy-awards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/02/19/cinema-autopsy%e2%80%99s-predictions-for-the-81st-academy-awards/</link>
	<description>Film reviews, criticism and discussion by Thomas Caldwell</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 05:45:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/02/19/cinema-autopsy%e2%80%99s-predictions-for-the-81st-academy-awards/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Caldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/?p=1472#comment-101</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/02/24/cinema-autopsy-on-the-81st-academy-awards-ceremony-and-winners/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cinema Autopsy on the 81st Academy Awards ceremony and winners&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/02/24/cinema-autopsy-on-the-81st-academy-awards-ceremony-and-winners/" rel="nofollow">Cinema Autopsy on the 81st Academy Awards ceremony and winners</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moogirl22</title>
		<link>http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/02/19/cinema-autopsy%e2%80%99s-predictions-for-the-81st-academy-awards/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>moogirl22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 03:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/?p=1472#comment-96</guid>
		<description>I think the main factor in Gabriel telling them to stuff themselves was the fact that he needs a big band and choir and whatnot to actually perform the song. It&#039;d be pointless to drag all those people out for a 65 second performance, which would barely squeeze in the first chorus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the main factor in Gabriel telling them to stuff themselves was the fact that he needs a big band and choir and whatnot to actually perform the song. It&#8217;d be pointless to drag all those people out for a 65 second performance, which would barely squeeze in the first chorus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/02/19/cinema-autopsy%e2%80%99s-predictions-for-the-81st-academy-awards/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Caldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 23:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/?p=1472#comment-94</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d forgotten about Springsteen&#039;s song from &lt;em&gt;The Wrestler&lt;/em&gt;. Why on Earth wasn&#039;t that nominated? It&#039;s not like there wasn&#039;t room for another song (or in fact another two songs) to get nominated. Very strange. I think they are trying to put together a faster moving show and feedback has indicated that the songs do slow proceedings down a bit - I know that in the past I&#039;ve been guilty of flicking channels when the songs get performed, but that is usually because the songs are crap. At first I thought Gabriel was being a bit precious about not performing as &quot;Down To Earth&quot; is 6 minutes long so asking him for a condensed version seemed reasonable. But I hadn&#039;t realised that they wanted him to cut it down to 65 seconds, which is ridiculous. I blame the &lt;em&gt;Idol&lt;/em&gt; factor - people are now used to hearing songs being performed as brief sound-bites instead of listening to the entire song. 

I was actually surprised that &lt;em&gt;Australia&lt;/em&gt; didn&#039;t get much a look in either as you are right, the Academy usually loves that stuff. At the same time, the &#039;beautiful&#039; cinematography and art direction of &lt;em&gt;Australia&lt;/em&gt; was a bit by numbers so I&#039;m glad it is not included. 

The Academy are funny about awarding people in recognition of their previous work, which is why Fincher and Boyle do have a good chance. Then again, Van Sant is due a quite a bit of recognition too. Anyway, it&#039;s good to have a Fincher fan around these parts. I&#039;ve long argued that &lt;em&gt;Se7en&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Fight Club&lt;/em&gt; are modern masterpieces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d forgotten about Springsteen&#8217;s song from <em>The Wrestler</em>. Why on Earth wasn&#8217;t that nominated? It&#8217;s not like there wasn&#8217;t room for another song (or in fact another two songs) to get nominated. Very strange. I think they are trying to put together a faster moving show and feedback has indicated that the songs do slow proceedings down a bit &#8211; I know that in the past I&#8217;ve been guilty of flicking channels when the songs get performed, but that is usually because the songs are crap. At first I thought Gabriel was being a bit precious about not performing as &#8220;Down To Earth&#8221; is 6 minutes long so asking him for a condensed version seemed reasonable. But I hadn&#8217;t realised that they wanted him to cut it down to 65 seconds, which is ridiculous. I blame the <em>Idol</em> factor &#8211; people are now used to hearing songs being performed as brief sound-bites instead of listening to the entire song. </p>
<p>I was actually surprised that <em>Australia</em> didn&#8217;t get much a look in either as you are right, the Academy usually loves that stuff. At the same time, the &#8216;beautiful&#8217; cinematography and art direction of <em>Australia</em> was a bit by numbers so I&#8217;m glad it is not included. </p>
<p>The Academy are funny about awarding people in recognition of their previous work, which is why Fincher and Boyle do have a good chance. Then again, Van Sant is due a quite a bit of recognition too. Anyway, it&#8217;s good to have a Fincher fan around these parts. I&#8217;ve long argued that <em>Se7en</em> and <em>Fight Club</em> are modern masterpieces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moogirl22</title>
		<link>http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/02/19/cinema-autopsy%e2%80%99s-predictions-for-the-81st-academy-awards/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>moogirl22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/?p=1472#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Ron Howard did &lt;em&gt;The Da Vinci Code&lt;/em&gt;? Ew. 

I agree with your thoughts on &lt;em&gt;WALL·E&lt;/em&gt; for best original score, but I actually liked &lt;em&gt;Slumdog Millionaire&#039;s&lt;/em&gt; music - one of the best things about it. I am still baffled at Bruce Springsteen&#039;s exclusion from the Best Song category, and even more baffled at &lt;em&gt;Slumdog&#039;s&lt;/em&gt; two nominations. Even more baffling is that they told Peter Gabriel his performance could only be 65 seconds long and is therefore boycotting the event (you go, man) -- wouldn&#039;t they be struggling for entertainment given the smaller number of Best Song nominees? I have no idea what they&#039;re going to do for entertainment, given the &lt;em&gt;Slumdog&lt;/em&gt; songs will probably be mashed into one like what they did with &lt;em&gt;Dreamgirls&lt;/em&gt; a while back.

I find the lack of nominations for &lt;em&gt;Australia&lt;/em&gt; to be astounding - I didn&#039;t expect any of the major categories, but at least (in addition to their single nomination for Costume) for Art Direction, and possibly cinematography. Usually the Academy loves stuff like that. And it&#039;s sad, because it will most likely not even get the Best Costume award because of &lt;em&gt;The Duchess&lt;/em&gt;. :(

For best director, whilst I have only seen &lt;em&gt;Slumdog&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Ben Button&lt;/em&gt; out of the nominees, I would FAR prefer Fincher to get it - and not for the reason most give in that he should have gotten it for &lt;em&gt;Zodiac&lt;/em&gt; or &lt;em&gt;Se7en&lt;/em&gt; and that this is some sort of &quot;sorry we didn&#039;t give you one then, but here you go&quot;. I think he did a really great job with that film. That said, I am assuming to change this opinion when I finally see &lt;em&gt;Milk&lt;/em&gt; - high expectations. :D

One thing I find quite sad is that whilst Ledger is set to win Best Supporting Actor, the nominees would be basically neck-to-neck if he had stayed alive. And I VERY much agree with your prediction of Cruz taking away the statue for &lt;em&gt;VCB&lt;/em&gt; - brilliant performance (I liked the film too). Her line about wanting to kill Cristina is pure gold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Howard did <em>The Da Vinci Code</em>? Ew. </p>
<p>I agree with your thoughts on <em>WALL·E</em> for best original score, but I actually liked <em>Slumdog Millionaire&#8217;s</em> music &#8211; one of the best things about it. I am still baffled at Bruce Springsteen&#8217;s exclusion from the Best Song category, and even more baffled at <em>Slumdog&#8217;s</em> two nominations. Even more baffling is that they told Peter Gabriel his performance could only be 65 seconds long and is therefore boycotting the event (you go, man) &#8212; wouldn&#8217;t they be struggling for entertainment given the smaller number of Best Song nominees? I have no idea what they&#8217;re going to do for entertainment, given the <em>Slumdog</em> songs will probably be mashed into one like what they did with <em>Dreamgirls</em> a while back.</p>
<p>I find the lack of nominations for <em>Australia</em> to be astounding &#8211; I didn&#8217;t expect any of the major categories, but at least (in addition to their single nomination for Costume) for Art Direction, and possibly cinematography. Usually the Academy loves stuff like that. And it&#8217;s sad, because it will most likely not even get the Best Costume award because of <em>The Duchess</em>. :(</p>
<p>For best director, whilst I have only seen <em>Slumdog</em> and <em>Ben Button</em> out of the nominees, I would FAR prefer Fincher to get it &#8211; and not for the reason most give in that he should have gotten it for <em>Zodiac</em> or <em>Se7en</em> and that this is some sort of &#8220;sorry we didn&#8217;t give you one then, but here you go&#8221;. I think he did a really great job with that film. That said, I am assuming to change this opinion when I finally see <em>Milk</em> &#8211; high expectations. :D</p>
<p>One thing I find quite sad is that whilst Ledger is set to win Best Supporting Actor, the nominees would be basically neck-to-neck if he had stayed alive. And I VERY much agree with your prediction of Cruz taking away the statue for <em>VCB</em> &#8211; brilliant performance (I liked the film too). Her line about wanting to kill Cristina is pure gold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
