<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cinema Autopsy on the 81st Academy Awards Nominees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/29/cinema-autopsy-on-the-81st-academy-awards-nominees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/29/cinema-autopsy-on-the-81st-academy-awards-nominees/</link>
	<description>Film reviews, criticism and discussion by Thomas Caldwell</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:17:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/29/cinema-autopsy-on-the-81st-academy-awards-nominees/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Caldwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/?p=1272#comment-100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/02/19/cinema-autopsy’s-predictions-for-the-81st-academy-awards/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cinema Autopsy’s predictions for the 81st Academy Awards
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/02/24/cinema-autopsy-on-the-81st-academy-awards-ceremony-and-winners/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cinema Autopsy on the 81st Academy Awards ceremony and winners&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/02/19/cinema-autopsy’s-predictions-for-the-81st-academy-awards/" rel="nofollow">Cinema Autopsy’s predictions for the 81st Academy Awards<br />
</a><br />
<a href="http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/02/24/cinema-autopsy-on-the-81st-academy-awards-ceremony-and-winners/" rel="nofollow">Cinema Autopsy on the 81st Academy Awards ceremony and winners</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/29/cinema-autopsy-on-the-81st-academy-awards-nominees/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Caldwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/?p=1272#comment-61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Definitely save your money for &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/27/film-review-milk-2008/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Milk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; as it is fantastic. 

&lt;em&gt;Rachel Getting Married&lt;/em&gt; is the best films I&#039;ve seen in ages so make sure you don&#039;t miss that (I&#039;ll post my review next week).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely save your money for <em><a href="http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/27/film-review-milk-2008/" rel="nofollow">Milk</a></em> as it is fantastic. </p>
<p><em>Rachel Getting Married</em> is the best films I&#8217;ve seen in ages so make sure you don&#8217;t miss that (I&#8217;ll post my review next week).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moogirl22</title>
		<link>http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/29/cinema-autopsy-on-the-81st-academy-awards-nominees/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[moogirl22]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/?p=1272#comment-60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think I may wait until it comes out on DVD - I&#039;m a little short on cash at the moment and I&#039;m absolutely dying to see &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/27/film-review-milk-2008/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Milk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; and, coming in a few weeks, &lt;em&gt;Rachel Getting Married&lt;/em&gt;, so I&#039;m being tight on what I see in the theatre. I&#039;ll definitely see it at some stage though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I may wait until it comes out on DVD &#8211; I&#8217;m a little short on cash at the moment and I&#8217;m absolutely dying to see <em><a href="http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/27/film-review-milk-2008/" rel="nofollow">Milk</a></em> and, coming in a few weeks, <em>Rachel Getting Married</em>, so I&#8217;m being tight on what I see in the theatre. I&#8217;ll definitely see it at some stage though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/29/cinema-autopsy-on-the-81st-academy-awards-nominees/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Caldwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 06:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/?p=1272#comment-59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m in Australia too and we&#039;re getting &lt;em&gt;Changeling&lt;/em&gt; this Thursday (5 February). My review for that goes up tomorrow and my piece on Eastwood will go up the day after so check that out for my recommendations of other films of his to see.

&lt;em&gt;Changeling&lt;/em&gt; is the better film over  &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/20/film-review-gran-torino-2008/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gran Torino&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; but I still recommend you see it. The humour lies in the fact that Eastwood&#039;s character is a bigot who says outrageous things. So while he makes racist jokes, you aren&#039;t supposed to laugh along with him. Instead you are laughing at how ridiculously conservative he is.

Anyway, the core of the film is about friendship, community, overcoming differences, sacrifice and redemption. I recommend it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in Australia too and we&#8217;re getting <em>Changeling</em> this Thursday (5 February). My review for that goes up tomorrow and my piece on Eastwood will go up the day after so check that out for my recommendations of other films of his to see.</p>
<p><em>Changeling</em> is the better film over  <em><a href="http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/20/film-review-gran-torino-2008/" rel="nofollow">Gran Torino</a></em> but I still recommend you see it. The humour lies in the fact that Eastwood&#8217;s character is a bigot who says outrageous things. So while he makes racist jokes, you aren&#8217;t supposed to laugh along with him. Instead you are laughing at how ridiculously conservative he is.</p>
<p>Anyway, the core of the film is about friendship, community, overcoming differences, sacrifice and redemption. I recommend it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moogirl22</title>
		<link>http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/29/cinema-autopsy-on-the-81st-academy-awards-nominees/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[moogirl22]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 06:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/?p=1272#comment-57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, cool, I&#039;ll check it out. I should really see more of Eastwood&#039;s films (as in ones he&#039;s directed rather than starred in). I can only remember seeing &lt;em&gt;Million Dollar Baby&lt;/em&gt; which I quite enjoyed. I&#039;ll probably see &lt;em&gt;Changeling&lt;/em&gt; when it&#039;s released here in Australia, but I&#039;m not sure about &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/20/film-review-gran-torino-2008/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gran Torino&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;. I don&#039;t usually find racist jokes funny.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, cool, I&#8217;ll check it out. I should really see more of Eastwood&#8217;s films (as in ones he&#8217;s directed rather than starred in). I can only remember seeing <em>Million Dollar Baby</em> which I quite enjoyed. I&#8217;ll probably see <em>Changeling</em> when it&#8217;s released here in Australia, but I&#8217;m not sure about <em><a href="http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/20/film-review-gran-torino-2008/" rel="nofollow">Gran Torino</a></em>. I don&#8217;t usually find racist jokes funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/29/cinema-autopsy-on-the-81st-academy-awards-nominees/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Caldwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/?p=1272#comment-52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The story doing the rounds was that Eastwood had said that &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/20/film-review-gran-torino-2008/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gran Torino&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; would be his final film as an actor. But I&#039;ve since heard that this was based on a statement that was taken out of context. From what I can tell Eastwood is not actively seeking acting roles any more but if something suitable comes his way then he will take it, which is what happened with &lt;em&gt;Gran Torino&lt;/em&gt;. Apparently after &lt;em&gt;Unforgiven&lt;/em&gt; there were similar stories floating around about him retiring and that certainly didn&#039;t happen.

Anyway, it doesn&#039;t look like he is going to stop directing films and his Nelson Mandela film should hit the cinemas at the end of this year.

Since next week is going to be such a slow week for new releases, I&#039;m hoping to do a overview piece on Eastwood&#039;s career so look out for that next Wednesday or Thursday.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The story doing the rounds was that Eastwood had said that <em><a href="http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/20/film-review-gran-torino-2008/" rel="nofollow">Gran Torino</a></em> would be his final film as an actor. But I&#8217;ve since heard that this was based on a statement that was taken out of context. From what I can tell Eastwood is not actively seeking acting roles any more but if something suitable comes his way then he will take it, which is what happened with <em>Gran Torino</em>. Apparently after <em>Unforgiven</em> there were similar stories floating around about him retiring and that certainly didn&#8217;t happen.</p>
<p>Anyway, it doesn&#8217;t look like he is going to stop directing films and his Nelson Mandela film should hit the cinemas at the end of this year.</p>
<p>Since next week is going to be such a slow week for new releases, I&#8217;m hoping to do a overview piece on Eastwood&#8217;s career so look out for that next Wednesday or Thursday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moogirl22</title>
		<link>http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/29/cinema-autopsy-on-the-81st-academy-awards-nominees/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[moogirl22]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/?p=1272#comment-51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess I just assumed that they would include a couple of the more popular films in the major categories as they have tended to do in the past, if only for ratings. It&#039;s not good for them if they lose a lot of viewers.

Don&#039;t think that I don&#039;t find the other Best Actor candidates worthy - I honestly think that if Rourke wasn&#039;t getting all this buzz it would be VERY hard to pick from this year&#039;s candidates. Very good year for male performances.

But you make an interesting point about Eastwood - however there&#039;s been some speculation that he may actually retire soon, this being one of his last films, or possibly even his final one, so I thought they might take that as an opportunity to say &quot;we love you, please don&#039;t leave&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I just assumed that they would include a couple of the more popular films in the major categories as they have tended to do in the past, if only for ratings. It&#8217;s not good for them if they lose a lot of viewers.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t think that I don&#8217;t find the other Best Actor candidates worthy &#8211; I honestly think that if Rourke wasn&#8217;t getting all this buzz it would be VERY hard to pick from this year&#8217;s candidates. Very good year for male performances.</p>
<p>But you make an interesting point about Eastwood &#8211; however there&#8217;s been some speculation that he may actually retire soon, this being one of his last films, or possibly even his final one, so I thought they might take that as an opportunity to say &#8220;we love you, please don&#8217;t leave&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/29/cinema-autopsy-on-the-81st-academy-awards-nominees/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Caldwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/?p=1272#comment-48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting comments. Remember that the Academy Awards are chosen by a group that consists of mostly old men who are heavily lobbied in the trade press by the big studios. The outcomes rarely have much to do with commercial success and even less to do with critical success. However, I do think that compared to many previous years, the nominations this year have been OK.

&lt;em&gt;The Reader&lt;/em&gt; is excellent so it deserves recognition. But it is also the type of film that the Academy loves so that&#039;s why it is included to such an extent while &lt;em&gt;The Wrestler&lt;/em&gt;, not a typical Academy film, is absent from several key categories. &lt;em&gt;Let the Right One In&lt;/em&gt; has been hugely popular the world over but do you really think that a Swedish vampire film is going to go down well with the same people who thought &lt;em&gt;Forrest Gump&lt;/em&gt; was a better film than &lt;em&gt;Pulp Fiction&lt;/em&gt;?

I also think it is a pity that Leonardo DiCaprio got overlooked for the best actor award. However, Richard Jenkins, Frank Langella, Sean Pen, Mickey Rourke and I think even Brad Pitt are also worthy candidates. 

Very good call on the absence of Sally Hawkins from the best actress category. I do think that Angelina Jolie deserves to be nominated, along with Kate Winslet and Anne Hathaway, but excluding Hawkins over Melissa Leo and Meryl Streep is very poor.

As for Eastwood - perhaps that by having two films eligible they both cancelled each other out? I don&#039;t know. I&#039;m not too upset as the guy has already won 4 Academy Awards for previous films. Also, he&#039;s a living legend and honestly doesn&#039;t need the endorsement of the Academy for people to recognise his greatness. He&#039;s above all that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting comments. Remember that the Academy Awards are chosen by a group that consists of mostly old men who are heavily lobbied in the trade press by the big studios. The outcomes rarely have much to do with commercial success and even less to do with critical success. However, I do think that compared to many previous years, the nominations this year have been OK.</p>
<p><em>The Reader</em> is excellent so it deserves recognition. But it is also the type of film that the Academy loves so that&#8217;s why it is included to such an extent while <em>The Wrestler</em>, not a typical Academy film, is absent from several key categories. <em>Let the Right One In</em> has been hugely popular the world over but do you really think that a Swedish vampire film is going to go down well with the same people who thought <em>Forrest Gump</em> was a better film than <em>Pulp Fiction</em>?</p>
<p>I also think it is a pity that Leonardo DiCaprio got overlooked for the best actor award. However, Richard Jenkins, Frank Langella, Sean Pen, Mickey Rourke and I think even Brad Pitt are also worthy candidates. </p>
<p>Very good call on the absence of Sally Hawkins from the best actress category. I do think that Angelina Jolie deserves to be nominated, along with Kate Winslet and Anne Hathaway, but excluding Hawkins over Melissa Leo and Meryl Streep is very poor.</p>
<p>As for Eastwood &#8211; perhaps that by having two films eligible they both cancelled each other out? I don&#8217;t know. I&#8217;m not too upset as the guy has already won 4 Academy Awards for previous films. Also, he&#8217;s a living legend and honestly doesn&#8217;t need the endorsement of the Academy for people to recognise his greatness. He&#8217;s above all that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moogirl22</title>
		<link>http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/29/cinema-autopsy-on-the-81st-academy-awards-nominees/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[moogirl22]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 06:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/?p=1272#comment-45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, I&#039;d be very upset if &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2008/12/26/film-review-the-curious-case-of-benjamin-button-2008/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Curious Case of Benjamin Button&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; didn&#039;t take home the statue - out of the nominees I only really see &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/27/film-review-milk-2008/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Milk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; as competition. This year has pretty much been a joke when it came down to nominations - Angelina Jolie for &lt;em&gt;Changeling&lt;/em&gt; but no Sally Hawkins for &lt;em&gt;Happy-Go-Lucky&lt;/em&gt;? Shunning Leonardo DiCaprio&#039;s wonderful performance in &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/22/film-review-revolutionary-road-2008/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Revolutionary Road&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; in favour of Brad Pitt&#039;s less-than-convincing southern accent? Don&#039;t get me wrong, they delivered great performances. I just don&#039;t see how they convinced themselves these were so much better than the rest.

Whilst I have not seen either films, I have heard a lot of anger towards the Academy for choosing to favour the not-so-critically-acclaimed &lt;em&gt;The Reader&lt;/em&gt; over the almost unanimously loved &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/12/film-review-the-wrestler-2008/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Wrestler&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; for the Best Picture and Best Director categories. Also, it&#039;s a bit disappointing to see Eastwood shunned for both Best Actor and Best Director.

But, in I think the biggest snub of the year due to technicalities, &lt;em&gt;Let The Right One In&lt;/em&gt;, the swedish vampire film, has been completely shut out of the foreign film category. I completely agree with the rest of the nominations, but come on, it was both a critical success AND was popular in the American box office. A bit stupid if you ask me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I&#8217;d be very upset if <em><a href="http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2008/12/26/film-review-the-curious-case-of-benjamin-button-2008/" rel="nofollow">The Curious Case of Benjamin Button</a></em> didn&#8217;t take home the statue &#8211; out of the nominees I only really see <em><a href="http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/27/film-review-milk-2008/" rel="nofollow">Milk</a></em> as competition. This year has pretty much been a joke when it came down to nominations &#8211; Angelina Jolie for <em>Changeling</em> but no Sally Hawkins for <em>Happy-Go-Lucky</em>? Shunning Leonardo DiCaprio&#8217;s wonderful performance in <em><a href="http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/22/film-review-revolutionary-road-2008/" rel="nofollow">Revolutionary Road</a></em> in favour of Brad Pitt&#8217;s less-than-convincing southern accent? Don&#8217;t get me wrong, they delivered great performances. I just don&#8217;t see how they convinced themselves these were so much better than the rest.</p>
<p>Whilst I have not seen either films, I have heard a lot of anger towards the Academy for choosing to favour the not-so-critically-acclaimed <em>The Reader</em> over the almost unanimously loved <em><a href="http://blog.cinemaautopsy.com/2009/01/12/film-review-the-wrestler-2008/" rel="nofollow">The Wrestler</a></em> for the Best Picture and Best Director categories. Also, it&#8217;s a bit disappointing to see Eastwood shunned for both Best Actor and Best Director.</p>
<p>But, in I think the biggest snub of the year due to technicalities, <em>Let The Right One In</em>, the swedish vampire film, has been completely shut out of the foreign film category. I completely agree with the rest of the nominations, but come on, it was both a critical success AND was popular in the American box office. A bit stupid if you ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

